|
|
Promulgation
of the IRR
Even as the Chairperson and the Commissioners were
occupied with the reorganization and consequent separation of about one
half of the SEC human resource, they spearheaded a team that studied,
discussed and drew up the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the
new Securities Regulations Code. Working
drafts were circulated, including posting through the SEC Webpage, and the
Chairman, with the Commissioners and selected SEC officials, actively
presided over many work group sessions, consultations and a public hearing
participated in by the players in the capital market.
On December 15, 2000, the Commission approved and
published the Implementing Rules and Regulations for the SRC.
The key areas covered by the IRR provide strong
fundamentals for good corporate governance essential to the
competitiveness of the Philippine capital market.
The
Commission adopted 94 new regulations, of which 45 amended the
regulations previously adopted under the Revised Securities Act to conform
to requirements under the Code, 35 implemented new reforms under the Code,
five (5) addressed issues concerning the newly reorganized Commission, and
nine (9) were definitional in nature.
The
Rules on definitions reflect improvement over those provided under the old
RSA Rules. Thus, the term
“investment contract” in SRC Rule 3.1-1 clarifies when a transaction
or scheme, which might not traditionally be viewed as a security, should
be treated as a security in order to protect investors and impose
liability for fraud in connection with the sale thereof under the SRC.
Another example is SRC Rule 3.6 which defines “clearing agency“
consistently with other sections of the SRC, as the term applies to
securities depositories.
The
Commission’s new organizational structure is described in SRC Rule 4.
The Code of Conduct for the Commissioners and staff is set forth in SRC
Rule 6.2 to address conflict of interest situations and notify the public
of the high standards of conduct imposed on the Commission.
Further, the IRR retained a substantial number of the old rules
under the RSA pertaining to the full and fair disclosure approach to
regulation of the public distribution of securities, appropriately revised
to conform to the SRC. Some
are entirely new, such as: SRC Rule 13 which clarifies the obligation of
issuers where the registration of securities has been suspended during a
public offering. SRC Rule 14
governs amendments to the registration statement. SRC Rule 10.1,
concerning exempt transactions, significantly changes previous
requirements for claiming exemptive relief by providing that such relief,
except in the case of private placements to non qualified investors, are
self executing and imposing notification requirements to the Commission
for monitoring purposes. Moreover, to streamline the disclosure rules,
specific items of disclosure have been moved from the rules to annexes,
which are attached to the rules.
The most significant reforms introduced by the SRC and the
corresponding portions of the IRR
are categorized as follows:
I.
Provides additional
protection to investors
II.
Clarifies prohibited market
practices
-
SRC Rule 24.1(b)-1 clarifies the types of practices which are
deemed manipulative and requires Broker Dealers, prior to executing an
order to buy or sell securities, to conduct due diligence by reviewing
objective factors which may indicate that a proposed transaction is
manipulative.
III.
Helps eliminate abusive
market practices
III.
Imposes additional
requirements to support the role of, and promote self regulation by market
participants
IV. Addresses systemic risk
issues
-
SRC Rule 36.4(a)-1 provides for trust funds for broker
dealer customers in the event that a broker dealer becomes insolvent and
the broker dealer’s paid up capital, and liquidation of his trading
rights, is insufficient to pay monies owed to clients.
V. Clarifies the role of an
Exchange to operate in the public interest
VI. Provides
additional enforcement powers to the Commission
-
SRC Rule 30.2-9 enables the Commission to obtain the names
of stockholders, members, participants, and clients in pursuance of an
investigation or market surveillance, and
Both the SRC and the IRR are long awaited
legislative solutions recommended by the studies much earlier undertaken
to address the problems of a weak capital market. The reforms prescribed by the promulgations gained stronger urgency
among policy makers and the general public, when the BW stock scandal
severely rocked the economy and nearly destroyed the stock market last
year. At the very least, the
extensive stock market manipulation that characterized the scandal laid
bare to the public the extreme weakness of the stock exchange as a market
facility and the inadequacies of the existing law in effectively defining
and deterring criminal offenses or fraud.
Both the SRC and IRR adopt the best practices
developed and observed in mature and credible markets as well as provide
standards consistent with those considered as internationally accepted, or
those set by the International Organization of Securities Commission
(IOSCO).
Go
Top Back
|